Toggle Main Navigation. Search Answers Clear Filters. Answers Support MathWorks. Search Support Clear Filters. Support Answers MathWorks. Search MathWorks. MathWorks Answers Support. Open Mobile Search.
Trial software. You are now following this question You will see updates in your activity feed. You may receive emails, depending on your notification preferences. Comparison of Matlab and Mathematica. Show older comments. Mark on 6 Apr Vote 0. Commented: Marcio Teixeira on 9 Apr Please be advised adequate article that compares Matlab and Mathematics.
I would be incredibly grateful if you compare these packages yourself here. S: usually compared only very old versions of programs. It has familiar control structures and program flow. It has predictable and understandable program flow and variable scope. It's straightforward to define complex functions with conditional flow structure etc.
However, restricting to using Mathematica vs. My usual flow for such a problem is: create a big old list of input values to some simulation block. Run that simulation block on all of those input values.
Visualize the results. It also does it very quickly and is designed exactly for this type of calculation. Yes, you can make lists and pass them through functions appropriately but it just feels like that isn't what Mathematica was designed for. On top of that, I've found Mathematica to be slower when I operate it in this mode. So in short: Mathematica is good for getting analytic results and certain visualization tasks. I've heard that MATLAB may outperform Python in terms of speed on some tasks but fortunately I'm not typically working on the types of computational tasks where that would matter so I haven't run up against this yet.
I have never used Matlab but my students have. I personally Mathematica to be absolutely unequaled for prototyping mathematical models.
It provides so much to work out why things work and don't. For any kind of serious application work, I go to Python with its massive libraries. My only complaint about Mathematica is that its debugging is rather limited and often inscrutable. I often work with tensors and Mathematica's treatment of these is phenomenal. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.
Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Mathematica vs. Asked 1 year, 3 months ago. Active 1 year, 1 month ago. Viewed 8k times. Improve this question. Peter Mortensen 3 3 silver badges 7 7 bronze badges. People are very defensive and reactive to criticisms of their favorite software languages, platforms, or workflows. At this point in presentations I discuss reasons why not to use a wide list of languages, platforms, etc. Perhaps the one aspect of MMA that I find most useful is creating 3D graphics for visualization, which I do not know of any other software that allows me to play around so easily with visualizations the way I can in MMA.
It doesn't make me want to go and explore. Show 10 more comments. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. George Ellis George Ellis 1 1 silver badge 7 7 bronze badges. Add a comment. Several letters in the names. Both are Turing complete. What are the pros and cons of each of them? Who are the appropriate users of each tool? Ones that make up their own mind based on experience with the two vs taking polls. Will it benefit someone if he knows both of them?
Sure, they can answer comparison questions. What are the capabilities of Mathematica that makes it unique? Can Mathematica play the role of an easy to use advanced scientific calculator for an engineer who is most of the time dealing with multi-variable calculus and partial differential electromagnetism equations? TensorFlow, then must we turn to use Mathematica with TensorFlow? It sounds complex, or? Show 1 more comment. Mathematica Because Mathematica is a pattern-substitution language and therefore unusual , it is very easy to lose track of what is happening behind the scenes.
Mathematica is only great for solving calculus problems. You should not try it to solve numerical problems. As we know that it is one of the paid software that offers great after-sale service to the users. If you purchase the highest version of MATLAB, then you will find the add-ons for free with every new release of the software. Then you will not get the add-ons.
But the community is not as excellent as it should be. In the community, you may not find genuine users to solve your problems. MatLab is one of the most expensive software as compared with its competitors. MATLAB offers that a limited number of hardware options to the users to connect with the data acquisition toolbox. And all are very expensive. It offers good analysis and quick result charts. On the other hand, Mathematica allows integration with analytic analysis of algebraic expressions.
You can also do the numerical implementation. Apart from that, Mathematica also offers various programming paradigms. It means that you can pick either one as per your problems. Some of the common programming paradigms supported by Mathematica are object-oriented programming language, list processing, and procedural programming.
On the other hand, Mathematica is also offering extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering.
0コメント